They also require at least three users on the plan, like Dropbox. The webpage has no info about how their unlimited plan works. They offer unlimited storage for $15/month or $180/year. Nothing close to the astonishing Drive speed. It seems that they are talking about a technical limitation, but that "this is not a hard limit".Ĥ0 Megabits per second (5 Megabytes per second). Many customers successfully sync more files without issue.Īlso to note, there is a hard limit of 100,000 files per folder (but you can create an unlimited number of folders). This is not a hard limit, and depends on the hardware specifications of the computer running the app (or web browser), as well as network speed, nested folder structure, and frequency of syncing activity. The Sync desktop app and web panel: Sync performance can get slower with more than 300,000 files in Sync. In General limits when using Sync it states that Syncing performance may be slower with over 300,000 files per user."ĭepending on how much "slower" going over 300k files gets, this would be a major issue for me as I have over 13M files right now. The part I found most annoying was that: "300,000 (per user account). The price is great, but I just checked and found this: How does unlimited storage work? Please keep us posted on your further findings on these matters! Does this mean I would have to pay 35*7= $245 just to upload my data in there? Still about StorJ, they mention a $7/TB bandwidth cost. Wasn't aware of StorJ, thanks for bringing them up! I just checked and they charge $4/TB/Mo, which while still economical when compared with the $5/TB/Mo and up the rest of the S3-clone crowd (Backblaze S2, Wasabi, Cloudflare R2, Contabo, etc) charge, is still way too expensive in my case: for my current 35TB of data, their price adds up to $140/mo, and this means that in less than 11 months I'd have more than enough money to buy 4 x 20TB drives like this and assemble a 40TB 4-disk-raidz2 NAS at a friend's house and store all my data there (I already have the rest of the hardware, and the friend ) But I was pleasantly surprised to see they allowed me to create an account with only my email address (no credit card 'we won't ever NEVER ever charge you' BS) and therefore they might be interesting for a couple of smaller projects. In the interim, I've been using Storj, seems to be the most reasonable of the many block based options. They seem to have a good reputation on Reddit (eg 1, 2, 3), but these testimonies are kinda old - I will ask for an update there and report my findings here.Īll other options I've seen so far are either too expensive (Wasabi, Backblaze B2, let's not even mention Amazon S3) or already totally enshittified (Jottacloud). In the past I asked here about these guys, but no one replied. They seem to be some sort of Google reseller, not sure if/how they're being affected by the latest GoogleDrive changes. LayerOnLine: $11/mo for "Unlimited Google Drive". Opendrive: $9.99/mo for "unlimited", but with the small letters stating that "Mass storage of media libraries and NAS/SAN devices not permitted on this plan" interpreted strictly, that is not the case: I'm certainly not storing any NAS/SAN data there as I don't own any, and re: "media libraries", as all my data is stored encrypted, it's totally opaque to them whether any of these files are "media" or not (and most are not, BTW - they are basically backups of my personal machines, which may contain "media" files but most files are otherwise). But I'm worried about this (the part that concerns me is "same policy as Dropbox, once you reach the storage limit, if you are an enterprise standard or higher user with 5 or more users, they will increase storage upon request, but it will be up to discretion on how much storage you will get." Is that actually how things are working with Dropbox? Here's what I've seen so far:ĭropbox: highly recommended by our own apparently can be had for $72/mo ( 3 users at $24/user in the "Advanced" plan). Given the current "enshittification" of Google in general and GoogleDrive in particular, I'm looking for alternatives for my currently ~35TB of data I know nothing is truly "unlimited", but I mean for that volume of data and working reasonably well, ie not throttling access speed to unusability, not frequently erroring out for no reason, and specially not eating my data.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |